Skip to main content

Special Status- and the case of Andhra Pradesh

‘Special category’ status is a classification given by Central Government to assist in development of those states that face geographical & socio-economic disadvantages like hilly terrains, strategic international borders, economic & infrastructural backwardness and non-viable state finances. Other parameters include geographical isolation, remoteness to major markets, and poor resources. These states enjoy the benefits such as significant concession on Excise, Customs, Income tax and corporate tax. The central government also bears 90% of expenditure on central sponsored schemes, in contrast to 70% in case of other states.
What criteria does Andhra Pradesh actually fit into? It is not hilly. It isn’t a strategic international border. It isn’t backward be it economically or in infrastructure (Sure, it doesn’t have a built capital city but, duh!). Andhra Pradesh by no means is geographically isolated nor it is in a remote location to major markets. It in fact has some major markets and ports be it Vizag or Krishnapatnam. So, by no means Andhra Pradesh is a backward state and deserves to be given a special status.
It is ridiculous why the then Prime Minister Manmohan Singh promised to give the special status to the divided Andhra Pradesh. And why Venkaiah Naidu got carried away by the passions of his state, but granting any state a special status is completely against the principles of BJP. They have riled long against the special status to J&K and have seen to it the economic benefits of Special Category Status has been fully diluted. Why do you think they would add more to the problem?
And with the reforms of the finance ministry, the special status is losing its importance due to the streamlining going on and integration of India into one big market.
Sure, Andhra Pradesh has lost a major revenue centre in form of Hyderabad, but they also have shredded the major burden of the underdeveloped rest of Telangana. It is also left with fertile costal delta.
While Andhra Pradesh’s loss of Hyderabad is painful, giving it a special status would neither help anyone nor fit with the overall politics among the major states. The state would be disappointed even if given the special status now as there is not much extra benefit. And if extra benefits are added, every other state with a poorer economy (think of BIMARU states) will ask for the same set of extra benefits.
Andhra Pradesh now has to build up its strengths from there rather than doing anything to weaken the union or weaken its founding principles.
Instead, the central government could invest more into building Amaravati, the new capital of Andhra Pradesh. That sounds more straightforward as it is apples to apples or Hyderabads to Amaravatis. And the people seeking special status for AP must start looking into the whole of India as one and address it as a whole, instead of focusing only on the single state of Andhra Pradesh.
Jai Hind!

Comments

  1. Well written , but u could have gone into deeper roots why the central govt denied to allot the sanctioned amount (due to insufficient submission of the requirements) and they fear that the funds alloted to the states will be diluted , better bringing awareness in the ppl especially the ones in social medias can make the situation questionable to states as well as the centre

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ravi Teja Yerramilli Agree that this is all a political circus. But why BJP is being silent on the issue? coz they have nothing to lose in AP? Don't the people there have the right to get answer? Why there are open ends left by the party leaving the state to it own grave, as each party making their drama about status (including TDP). It is a conflict of truth, if this is not really posible? why are the BJP local bodies playing foul game drama?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Lipstick Effect- An insight into a rare economic phenomenon

There is a slowdown buzz all around the world and is visible also in India. Sectors such as automobile and real-estate are often making headlines and not for a good reason. It is only to report the falling sales figures, or slowing growth rates. In the latest quarter, non-oil, non-gold imports are down — indicating that Indians are buying less of imported goods too. On the other hand, the movie business is doing very well. Union Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad has cited that Rs 120 crore business done by three Bollywood movies on a single day suggests the strength in the fundamentals of the Indian economy, but he was actually articulating a real economic phenomenon playing out in India currently. It may be puzzling to see how few businesses such as Movies, and Electronics are performing so well despite the apparent slowdown in most of the other segments of economy. It does not mean the movie industry is defying the slowdown. It’s the ‘Lipstick Effect’ at play. It was first ob...

KARNATAKA, TAMILNADU AND THE CAUVERY CRISIS

Cauvery crisis is a victim of water mismanagement and chauvinism of both Tamil Nadu and Karnataka. Both sides come from an imaginary “state pride” and listen little to reason. Both sides don’t understand that neither owns the river. Both sides are filled with insecurity and inferiority complex. Karnataka believes that it doesn’t get heard by higher authorities and has a victim mindset especially when the Supreme Court is involved. Tamil Nadu believes that it doesn’t get heard by neither national parties as neither of them are viable in the state (and would not try anything to get political voice either). Karnataka’s Point of View : 1.  It is not getting half the share of water as the original agreement between the Madras presidency and Mysore was when Madras had an upper hand. 2. The drinking water crisis of Bangalore supersedes agricultural water needs. World over drinking water is prioritized over other uses.  3. The times when it was asked to releas...