Skip to main content

The Lipstick Effect- An insight into a rare economic phenomenon


There is a slowdown buzz all around the world and is visible also in India. Sectors such as automobile and real-estate are often making headlines and not for a good reason. It is only to report the falling sales figures, or slowing growth rates. In the latest quarter, non-oil, non-gold imports are down — indicating that Indians are buying less of imported goods too.
On the other hand, the movie business is doing very well. Union Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad has cited that Rs 120 crore business done by three Bollywood movies on a single day suggests the strength in the fundamentals of the Indian economy, but he was actually articulating a real economic phenomenon playing out in India currently.

It may be puzzling to see how few businesses such as Movies, and Electronics are performing so well despite the apparent slowdown in most of the other segments of economy.

It does not mean the movie industry is defying the slowdown. It’s the ‘Lipstick Effect’ at play. It was first observed during the great economic depression of 1930s. While stock markets collapsed, and consumer demand for most products plunged, marketers and economists stumbled across one interesting observation — demand for lipstick went up significantly. So, why were women scrambling to buy lipstick during a downturn?


The reason- lies in consumer behaviour. They do not have enough to spend on big-ticket luxury items during the downturns; however, most still find the cash for purchase for small luxury items, such as premium lipstick, a meal at a good restaurants, or a small electronic gadget to make themselves feel good. For this reason, companies that benefit from the lipstick effect tend to be resilient even during economic downturns.

Decoding the Lipstick Effect:
"Small joys, big appeal"


Economic situation and the behaviour of consumer under the economic situation both play a role in rolling out the lipstick effect. It is one of the reasons that fast-casual restaurants and movie complexes typically do well amid recessions. Cash-strapped consumers want to treat themselves to something that lets them to forget their financial problems. They can’t afford to escape on an expensive vacation. However, they’ll settle for a fairly cheap night out and a movie, adjusting their budget accordingly.

The lipstick effect also affects certain regions dealing with a prolonged economic contraction or austerity measures. For example, Brexit hit certain parts of the U.K. economy very hard, especially metropolitan areas in the north such as Liverpool. Some economists note a lipstick effect in parts of Britain amid the austerity, including spending on not only lipstick, but also certain wines and coffee at local bean roasteries.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Special Status- and the case of Andhra Pradesh

‘Special category’ status is a classification given by Central Government to assist in development of those states that face geographical & socio-economic disadvantages like hilly terrains, strategic international borders, economic & infrastructural backwardness and non-viable state finances. Other parameters include geographical isolation, remoteness to major markets, and poor resources. These states enjoy the benefits such as significant concession on Excise, Customs, Income tax and corporate tax. The central government also bears 90% of expenditure on central sponsored schemes, in contrast to 70% in case of other states. What criteria does Andhra Pradesh actually fit into? It is not hilly. It isn’t a strategic international border. It isn’t backward be it economically or in infrastructure (Sure, it doesn’t have a built capital city but, duh!). Andhra Pradesh by no means is geographically isolated nor it is in a remote location to major markets. It in fact has some major ...

KARNATAKA, TAMILNADU AND THE CAUVERY CRISIS

Cauvery crisis is a victim of water mismanagement and chauvinism of both Tamil Nadu and Karnataka. Both sides come from an imaginary “state pride” and listen little to reason. Both sides don’t understand that neither owns the river. Both sides are filled with insecurity and inferiority complex. Karnataka believes that it doesn’t get heard by higher authorities and has a victim mindset especially when the Supreme Court is involved. Tamil Nadu believes that it doesn’t get heard by neither national parties as neither of them are viable in the state (and would not try anything to get political voice either). Karnataka’s Point of View : 1.  It is not getting half the share of water as the original agreement between the Madras presidency and Mysore was when Madras had an upper hand. 2. The drinking water crisis of Bangalore supersedes agricultural water needs. World over drinking water is prioritized over other uses.  3. The times when it was asked to releas...